GSL.view: Views
These types allow the user to distinguish between owning and non-owning pointers and between pointers to a single object and pointers to the first element of a sequence.
These "views" are never owners.
References are never owners.
The names are mostly ISO standard-library style (lower case and underscore):
T*// TheT*is not an owner, may be null; assumed to be pointing to a single element.char*// A C-style string (a zero-terminated array of characters); may be null.const char*// A C-style string; may be null.T&// TheT&is not an owner and can never be a "null reference"; references are always bound to objects.
The "raw-pointer" notation (e.g. int*) is assumed to have its most common meaning; that is, a pointer points to an object, but does not own it.
Owners should be converted to resource handles (e.g., unique_ptr or vector<T>) or marked owner<T*>
owner<T*>// aT*that owns the object pointed/referred to; may benullptr.owner<T&>// aT&that owns the object pointed/referred to.
owner is used to mark owning pointers in code that cannot be upgraded to use proper resource handles.
Reasons for that include:
- Cost of conversion.
- The pointer is used with an ABI.
- The pointer is part of the implementation of a resource handle.
An owner<T> differs from a resource handle for a T by still requiring an explicit delete.
An owner<T> is assumed to refer to an object on the free store (heap).
If something is not supposed to be nullptr, say so:
not_null<T>//Tis usually a pointer type (e.g.,not_null<int*>andnot_null<owner<Foo*>>) that may not benullptr.Tcan be any type for which==nullptris meaningful.span<T>// [p:p+n), constructor from{p, q}and{p, n};Tis the pointer typespan_p<T>//{p, predicate}[p:q) whereqis the first element for whichpredicate(*p)is truestring_span//span<char>cstring_span//span<const char>
A span<T> refers to zero or more mutable Ts unless T is a const type.
"Pointer arithmetic" is best done within spans.
A char* that points to something that is not a C-style string (e.g., a pointer into an input buffer) should be represented by a span.
There is no really good way to say "pointer to a single char" (string_span{p, 1} can do that, and T* where T is a char in a template that has not been specialized for C-style strings).
zstring// achar*supposed to be a C-style string; that is, a zero-terminated sequence ofcharornull_ptrczstring// aconst char*supposed to be a C-style string; that is, a zero-terminated sequence ofconstcharornull_ptr
Logically, those last two aliases are not needed, but we are not always logical, and they make the distinction between a pointer to one char and a pointer to a C-style string explicit.
A sequence of characters that is not assumed to be zero-terminated should be a char*, rather than a zstring.
French accent optional.
Use not_null<zstring> for C-style strings that cannot be nullptr. ??? Do we need a name for not_null<zstring>? or is its ugliness a feature?